Page 54 - PCC04

References (2)
• Gibbons WE, Cedars M, Ness RB. Toward understanding obstetrical outcome in advanced assisted reproduction: varying sperm, oocyte, and uterine source and diagnosis. Fertil Steril 2011; 95:1645–9.
• • • • •
• Lamba N, Jadva V, Kadam K, Golombok S. The psychological wellbeing and prenatal bonding of gestational surrogates. Hum Reprod 2018; 33: 646‐53.
• Parkinson J, Tran C, Tan T et al. Perinatal outcome after in‐vitro fertilization‐surrogacy. Hum Reprod 1998; 14:671–6.
• Spandorfer SD. Unlocking the cause of increased adverse singleton pregnancy outcomes: the role of the assisteted reproductive derived embryo. Fertil Steril 2017; 108:953.
• Storgaard M, Loft A, Bergh C et al. Obstetric and neonatal complications in pregnancies conceived after oocyte donation – a systematic review and meta‐analysis. BJOG.2017; 124(4):561‐72
• Sunkara SK, Antonisami B, Selliah HY, Kamath MS. Perinatal outcomes after gestational surrogacy versus autologous IVF: analysis of national data. Reprod Biomed Online 2017; 35:708–14
• Söderström‐Anttila V, Blomqvist T, Foudila T et al. Experience of in vitro fertilization surrogacy in Finland. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2002;81: 747–52.
Goldfarb JM, AustinC, Peskin B et al. Fifteen years´ experience with an in‐vitro fertilization surrogate gestational pregnancy programme. Hum Reprod 2000; 15:1075–8.
Golombok S, Blake L, Casey P et al. Children born through reproductive donation: a longitudinal study of psychological adjustment. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2013; 54:653–60.
Jadva V, Imrie S. Children of surrogate mothers: psychological well‐ being, family relationships and experiences of surrogacy. Hum Reprod 2014; 29:90–6.
Jadva V, Imrie S, Golombok S. Surrogate mothers 10 years on: a longitudinal study of psychological well‐being and relationships with the parents and child. Hum Reprod 2015; 30:373–9.
JadvaV,MurrayC,LycettEetal.Surrogacy:theexperiencesofsurrogate mothers. Hum Reprod 2003; 18:2196–204.
References (3)
54
Page 48 of 88