Page 80 - Eshre 2018

1. Effect of Age, Indication and Stimulation on Oocytes Survival and CLBR
Results in different populations using vitrified oocytes.
N patients
N Cycles
Mean age±SD
No oocytes inseminated Survival rate (%)
Clinical pregnancy rate (%) CLBR/patient (%)
15899* 18579 25.3 ± 2.2a** 11.4 ± 2.1 a 92.3 a 59.3 a 11445 (71.9) a
316
332 33.3±1.4b 7.5 ± 4.2 b 83.6 b, d 38.7 b 164 (51.8) b
680
208 (32.1) c
119
125
32.5±2.8b 10.3 ± 3.7 d 91.4 a 47.2 a 61/89 (68.5) a
532
99/367 (26.8) c
42
42 31.6±2.1b 6.4 ± 3.7c,f 81.2c 30.9c 16/38 (42.1)b,c
37
9/31 (29.0)c
Poor Responder Poor Responder
≤35
≥36
EFP EFP
Onco‐FP Onco‐FP
Oocyte Donation
≤35
≥36
≤35
≥36
648
503
38.6 ± 1.5 c 6.8 ± 1.5 c 84.9 b 30.6 c
38.7 ± 1.0 c 8.6 ± 1.4 e 82.1 c,d 20.3 c
36
38.0 ± 2.1c 5.9 ± 2.1f 82.7 c,d 10 (27.0) b,c
*Recipients; **Donors age. Different superscripts= P<0.05
Young social freezers achieve similar outcomes as donors.
Results are lower in young poor responders, onco FP and in older patients. Young onco FP achieve low outcomes
Page 74 of 135
IVI unpublished data
80